The bar chart compares and contrasts data on the amount of waste that being diposed in several ways in four distinct regions namely: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman.
Generally speaking, compositing is the least favoured method out the other four for waste diposal.
A closer look at the diagram shows a great amount of garbage in Toronto is buried in the landfill, at approximately 75% which is more than 40% and 20% with the same method in Madrid and Amman respectively. The most favoured process used in Madrid is incineration with 40% which roughly share the same amount in Amman. Kuala Lumpur, however, is widely triggered 55% of thier waste materials by the former method among the other four cities. A futher point to note is that the amount of waste processed by compositing is hardly used than the others which was one-tenth compared to that of recycling in Amman. Furthermore, Madrid and Kuala Lumpur share the same amount of garbage recycling with about 20% that is twice as large as that of incineration in Toronto.
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- The map below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day 78
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A,B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss and give opinion 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89265536723 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54549713872 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5826144202 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.714285714 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361125387037 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167141551863 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955917605014 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245861426251 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933654857794 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.