There are widely divergent opinions about the extinction of animals. Some state that people involving nations and individuals have to address solutions to this concern, while those opposing to this advocate that humanity is far more crucial compared to animal species. I assume that human roles in protecting wildlife species are as important as human beings. This essay will demonstrate both points of view and give a relevant example.
On the one hand, there is no room for doubt about the importance of wildlife animals to humans in many aspects, therefore, keeping their extinction at bay is greatly beneficial. In terms of national development, particularly financial income, rare wildlife species which native to a specific region can attract global tourists, leading to a boost in the annual gross domestic product of a country. Therefore, many countries have a responsibility to protect and preserve these animals. With regard to the individual level, animals make a huge contribution to the balance of the ecosystem of a particular area. Taking Australian bees as a prime example, which is beneficial to agricultural development by killing various types of toxic insects, positively impacts on local farmers, helping them to make a living. Those are the reasons why I believe humans must protect animals.
On the other hand, a host of skeptics go against the former statement and believe humanity should be considered instead of animals. First of all, thanks to the rapid development of advanced technology, genetic modification of extinct animals could easily be accomplished, and therefore, prevent the brink of wildlife animal extinction. Thus, animal protection simply could be overlooked, and all the resources should be invested to promote human beings compared to animals. On top of that, the human can live without animals because there is also a wide range of food which is offered to support human living such as crops, vegetables or artificial food from laboratory and so on.
In conclusion, I believe that despite the fact of human beings are extremely crucial, animal protection has to be taken into consideration to maintain the balance of the Earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... believe humans must protect animals. On the other hand, a host of skeptics go...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, first of all, with regard to, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29106628242 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88400783346 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593659942363 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8178397564 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312922215862 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980303021093 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497882929738 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18471227374 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569262359373 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.