The bar chart below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one city in 1950, 1970 and 1990
The given bar chart depicts the proportion of commuters in a city in 3 separated years 1950, 1970 and 1990. The data are categorized in 4 different group mean of transport. Overall, the number of people using car noticeably increased over the recorded period, while there was a sudden decrease in the number of people who walked.
Firstly, in 1950, people who traveled by car and bus had by far the lowest portion, by 5% and 20% respectively. However, over the given period these figures received a noticeable rise. To be more specific, the number of car users grew by more than 10 times in 1970, then reached the peak of 45% in the end of the period while that of people using bus showed a dramatic decline in 1990 to 10%.
Meanwhile, in 1950, a staggering 35% of people recognized as walking and the remaining 30% claimed to bike users. Corresponding to the shift in the subsequence 40 years, these two groups recorded a steady decline, people who use bike and walk plummeted to 10% and 12% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'mean' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'means'.
Suggestion: means
...ta are categorized in 4 different group mean of transport. Overall, the number of pe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63687150838 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68286746731 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6095864375 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186860756185 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833796546211 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830055353448 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126048415636 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750442220639 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.