the bar chart below shows information about reasons why men and women make a trip in 2009
The graph illustrates the reasons why people make a trip in 2009, devided into two genders.
Overall, it is immediately apparent that most of male and female made a trip to travelling to work and the difference between two genders in this categories is the most significant. Both two sexes travelled for day trip least.
There are three categories that the figure for men exceeded that of women. While 35000 woman traveled to work in 2009, the number of women was slightly lower ( about 30000). Similarly, about 15000 men traveled to learn other cultures, compared to just over 10000 for women. The quantity of male and female for day trip was both marginal, about 5500 and 10000 respectively
On the other hand, family and friends, scenery and shopping is more liked by women than men. In term of family and friends, the number of women making a trip for their beloved was 25000, as opposed to just approxiately 20000 for men. The distance between two genders in scenery and shopping was minimal, just over about 200 women traveled more than men. There were about 27000 women traveled for scenery in comparison to 30000 for shopping
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-09 | quanganh3110 | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-12 | Fcnssk | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d the difference between two genders in this categories is the most significant. Bot...
^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the number of women was slightly lower about 30000. Similarly, about 15000 men ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38473117998 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.516963059 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253372355161 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118624358677 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565650158458 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168648237213 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740858650098 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.