The bar chart below shows the number of research students studying different subject in 2005.
The bar graph compares how many research students who studied 5 different subjects in 2005.
Overall, there were more male research students than females in 2005. It is also noticeable that natural sciences were the most popular subject in both genders, while the least preferred subject for men was linguistic, women show little interest in mathematics.
Both genders comprised the same number in natural sciences at 200 each. The only subject where the figure for females exceeded that of males was linguistic, with around 10 females and roughly 80 males.
Among the four subjects where men outnumbered women, mathematics had the most significant difference at around 160. With regard to engineering and programming, both subjects had an equal number of male students at 150 as opposed to females at less than 100 each. A minimal difference of 25 between genders could be seen in psychology subject with 200 male students and 175 female learners.
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 73
- The charts below show the primary purposes for British people leaving their country in 1999 and the amount of those people who left the country for less than a week. 67
- The pie charts below indicate the primary uses of the internet in Japan in the years 1995 and 2005. 73
- The table below gives information about consumers spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002. 61
- Some people think that not all criminals should be kept in prison. Some criminals should do unpaid work to help other people in the community. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...han 100 each. A minimal difference of 25 between genders could be seen in psychol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25974025974 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64189171556 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1770136993 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.25 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297236487566 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140695500561 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120933810194 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212226819349 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140323332605 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.