The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants.
Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given chart illustrates the figure for males and females who participated in six courses evening and their ages in the year 2009
Overall, it is clear that the number of female students attending courses was higher than male students, with language classes witnessing the most dramatic rise. In addition, people who were 50 years or over had the highest compared to other age groups.
Regarding the bar chart, reaching the highest level, at 40 people, the number of female students doubled compared to male students. By contrast, sculptures were registered the lowest by both genders, reaching 10 and 5 people respectively. Meanwhile, painting courses also were favorited, which stood at 30 people, was 5 people higher than that of male students. While drama participants were lower, accounting for 20 and 10 people.
In terms of the pie chart, we can see that the highest percentage of people aged 50 or over, at 42 %. It's followed by those who were 40-49 age group, reaching 26 %. Meanwhile, the proportion of 30-36-year-old was 16%, compared to just 11% and 5% was 20-29-year-old and teenagers people respectively.
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person so medical service should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 84
- M t s ng i ngh r ng s c kh e t t l r t quan tr ng i v i m i ng i v v y d ch v y t kh ng n n c i u h nh b i c c c ng ty v l i nhu n u i m c a d ch v y t t nh n c v t tr i h n nh c i m kh ng 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or males and females who participated in six courses evening and their ages in th...
^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at 42 %. Its followed by those who were 40-49 age group, reaching 26 %. Meanwhil...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16847826087 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84827019086 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9266333712 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193506097742 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773769531534 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642240085319 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14282096867 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711313647836 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.