Given are the bar chart delineating the number of men and women taking part in various evening courses at an adult education centre and the pie chart depicting the percentage of people in separate age groups attending these courses in the year 2009.
Perceptibly, language was the most popular course among females, while males partook in painting more than other courses. As for the information supplied from the other figure, the over-50s accounted for by far the largest percentage of participants compared to other age groups.
In terms of the figures of people attending the courses, that of women in drama and language were twice as many as men's, with the former being 20 and the latter being 40, while the opposite was true for sculpture, which attracted 10 mens. Meanwhile, painting constituted 30 females and surpassed males by 5 individuals, albeit being the most favored course for men.
In regards to the proportion of age groups attendance, people aged 50 and over were the most common learners in the centre by 42%, followed by the 40 to 49-year-olds with 26%. Likewise, the age groups of 30s and 20s composed of 16% and 11% respectively, while the under-20s accounted for 5% of the group.
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 67
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 73
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the bar chart delineating the number of...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: Regarding; With regard to
...being the most favored course for men. In regards to the proportion of age groups attendance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67377135312 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5086057248 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.285714286 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1428571429 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311951128016 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135753229412 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20263833017 0.0843802449381 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210441943843 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.242054861882 0.0819641961636 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.