The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrated how five significant types of transport in the UK are used to travel in the ten-year period from 1990 to 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that the total of passenger kilometers started at 110 billion and experienced an increase by around 10 billion over the decade in question. While the growth was evident in the rail, bus and air travel, the quantity of UK residents using bicycle and motorbike, however, showed a slight decline.
Looking at the details, the statistics for bus and train travel were similar, approximately 50 million kilometers for each in 2000. These two types of vehicles took the dominant places with the kilometers number recorded over five times more than air travel in the next position. The proportion of distance travel by bicycle and motorbike, which had the same figure as air travel, was of low importance, with less than 8 million UK inhabitants choose them to travel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Johndavisvu | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | tranvuongphuongmy | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | tranvuongphuongmy | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | hnhung | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the tenyear period from 1990 to 2000 Overall what stands out from the chart i...
^^^
Line 2, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otorbike however showed a slight decline Looking at the details the statistics fo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5395619701 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 160.0 22.4926829268 711% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 768.0 112.824112599 681% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 160.0 22.9334400587 698% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.0 5.23603664747 458% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200693248057 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200693248057 0.103423049105 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149465889627 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543870683756 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 81.2 13.2329268293 614% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -82.46 61.2550243902 -135% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.5 10.3012195122 626% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.74 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.32 8.06136585366 190% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 66.0 10.9970731707 600% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 57.0 11.0658536585 515% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.