The bar chart below shows the passenger-kilometers traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives information about the number of passenger kilometers covered by distinct methods of transport in the UK between 1990 and 2000.
It is clear that bus and rail were more popular means of transportation in the UK compared to a bicycle, motorbikes, and air. Besides, the demand for using air, bus, rail and in total tended to rise over the period, while there was an opposite trend which could be seen in bicycle and motorbike.
In 1990, bicycles and motorbikes were not used much in the UK, at about 5 billion passenger kilometers, and the figure slightly declined to 4 billion over the next 10 years. By contrast, the number of passenger kilometers traveling by air stood at relatively low, with solely 5 billion in 1990, but it saw a steep growth in 2000, at about 8 billion.
In addition, there wasn’t a dramatic difference when looking at the number of passenger kilometers by bus and rail. More specifically, both means of transport accounted for 42 billion in 1990, more or less, before increasing to nearly 50 billion in 2000. Likewise, the figure for total also grew from 100 billion to 110 billion between 1990 and 2000.
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The table and graph below give information about cinema attendance in Australia between 1994 and 2002 78
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places and how to increase its popularity 73
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, likewise, look, so, while, in addition, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77889447236 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68104462906 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1971965467 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202617823474 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102612633848 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075079969954 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146026460983 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830255970385 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.