The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the proportion of Australian male and female doing regular physical activity in different age groups in 2010.
It is clear that the percentages of women was higher than the figure for men in almost each age group. However, completely different age groups can be seem if we look at the specific figures for boys and girls.
The percentage of men aged between 15 and 24 who worked by hand was much higher than the figure for women, at 52.8% and 47.7% respectively. By contrast, the rate of women of 4 different age group from 25 to 64 who done regular physical activity were lower than the figure of women from 6.7% to 13%.
The proportion of women aged between 65 and over was almost same with the figure foe men at 46.7% and 47.1% respectively. While the rate of women rose overall between 47.1% and 53.3%, the figure for men jumped to around 13.3% above 39.5 of age group from 35 to 44.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The diagram below shows how tomato ketchup is made.Write at least 150 words. 56
- It is more important to learn about local history than foreign history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Wrire at least 250 words. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divides into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes ( for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50898203593 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33316343596 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.4987589214 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276137059281 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154551437799 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883359879311 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204954151069 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884832157734 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.