The bar chart below shows the percentage of budget the average family spent on restaurant meals.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the percentage of budget the average family spent on restaurant meals.

An illustration compares the expenditure ratio on restaurants meals and homemade meals and gives information about the number of meals eaten in two different restaurant types during four-year period
It can be seen from the pie chart that in the first year of the time period, the average family spent only one-tenth of their total food budget on eating outside. this lowest budget resulted in smallest number of meals in both types of restaurants. there is no difference in this number of meals between fast food and sitdown restaurants, 20 meals per year. After one decade, the spending ratio on restaurant meals increased by 5% that led to the higher frequency of outside meals in restaurants.
The most significant point in those charts charts can be seen in the two last decades. In particular, the food expenditure rose significantly in 1990, it was about three times higher than that of the year 1970. As a result, there was an increase in the number of meals which were slight in sit- down restaurants while dramatic in fast food one. In the year 2000, the money spared for restaurant meals was five times as much that of the beginning point, which correlated to the skyrocketed numbers of outside meals, especially in the pattern of fast food
In summary, there was an upward trend in the eating-out budget as well as meals eaten in two restaurant category. this rise was more sharp in final years

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-27 Littlebinbin 56 view
2018-07-04 sandee 78 view
Essays by user Littlebinbin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...restaurant types during four-year period it it ' style='caret-color: rg...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...taurant types during four-year period it it ' style='caret-color: rgb51, ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ir total food budget on eating outside. this lowest budget resulted in smallest numb...
^^^^
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the smallest'.
Suggestion: in the smallest
...ng outside. this lowest budget resulted in smallest number of meals in both types of restau...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 384, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
... of meals in both types of restaurants. there is no difference in this number of meal...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: charts
...s. The most significant point in those charts charts ' style='caret-color: rgb51, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., especially in the pattern of fast food In summary, there was an upward trend in...
^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...s well as meals eaten in two restaurant category. this rise was more sharp in final year...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...meals eaten in two restaurant category. this rise was more sharp in final years
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, well, while, in particular, in summary, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29962546816 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.65642830374 2.65546596893 138% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524344569288 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 134.945073417 43.030603864 314% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.222222222 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117089724995 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044676920651 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428235042024 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757743776342 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185793694476 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.