The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.

The bar chart gives information about the proportion of average property prices growing in different nations of Algeria, China and Argentina from 2007 to 2010.

 

Overall, Algerian property prices have declined, while China's has the opposite. The percentage of property prices in Argentina fluctuated.

 

To begin with, Algeria’s average property prices were the highest in three countries with 6.0% and the percentage of China was 2.0% which was the lowest prices in 2007. In the next two years 2009, Algeria's percentage of prices had a dramatically decline to approximately 3%, and the property prices of China became the highest value to over 5.0%. In 2010, the proportion of Algeria had a stable trend with 3.0%. China was continue high property by increasing triple to 6.0% during the period time.

In contrast, the calculations for Argentina were recognized at the outset as 3.0%. It was significant growth to nearly 5,0% in the following year. The whole country's prices, however, dropped enormously by 4.0% in 2009, and then slightly increased again to over 2.0% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-18 nguyenanh9182 view
2023-03-21 raspreet. 78 view
2023-03-09 TLan168 78 view
2023-03-06 TLan168 view
2023-03-06 TLan168 78 view
Essays by user TLan168 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ina and Argentina from 2007 to 2010.   Overall, Algerian property prices have d...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erty prices in Argentina fluctuated.   To begin with, Algeria’s average propert...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...2009, Algerias percentage of prices had a dramatically decline to approximately 3%, and the property p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 423, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
...had a stable trend with 3.0%. China was continue high property by increasing triple to 6...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in contrast, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71645582173 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573863636364 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3215180681 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343229698394 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12702487696 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102182702206 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20618855447 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874477970919 0.0819641961636 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.