The bar chart below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over of three countries in 1980 and 2000 and prediction in 2030.
The graph compares the percentage for the population in the 65 and older age range in three nations namely Canada, Germany, and the UK from 1980 to 2030.
Overall, the figures of citizens aged over 65 in all three countries follow an upward trend throughout the period shown. Also, the rate of Germany’s population aged 65 and up is always the highest of the three various nations.
In 1980, senior residents in Germany accounted for 15% of the total population in Germany, compared with around 14% and 10% recorded in the share of that in the UK and Canada respectively. Over the following 20 years, the proportion of people in the age bracket in Canada and Germany followed a similar pattern, rising significantly by 10% each. In the meantime, the percentage of the population aged over 65 UK experienced a slight increase to 15%.
In the next 30 years, it is predicted that the figure for senior residents in Germany will increase to 25%. Meanwhile, the rate of elderly people in Canada and the UK is forecast to go up to about 22% and 18% respectively
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 61
- The following diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73655913978 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7248306879 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521505376344 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0234280367 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275308556531 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123004434985 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783615809685 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169705881715 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087706271877 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.