The graph shows six main reasons why British adults visited the Internet in 2001.
It is clear from the bar chart that the majority of adults in England went to the Internet for mailing purpose. Additionally, while games were more popular among male adults, health research and commercial (consumer) were cited by mostly female users.
In addition, while nearly 40% of British males played games when they went online, the gaming figure for female users were lower, at only 20%. By contrast, 40% of female adults used the Internet for healthcare research, whereas around 20% of males had the same purpose. Like wise, commercial (consumer) was cited by 60% of females, while this rate for the other gender was lower, at roughly 40%.
It is interesting to note that almost every British adults used the Internet because of Email. Meanwhile, banking and commercial (vendor) were equally popular among both sexes, at 40% and 20% respectively.
- The charts below give information about travel to and from the UK and about the most popular countries for UK residents to visit 87
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than the traditional clothing Why Is this a positive or negative development 87
- Accomodation and transport problems are increasing in many large cities. Businesses are encouraged to move to rural areas . Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages ? 67
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to university in order to travel or to work Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10322580645 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34452003479 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.5560093066 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284225677413 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134532230877 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112649185988 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197013504603 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963398013865 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.