The chart compares the proportions of four different age groups going to the cinema in the UK between 1990 and 2010.
It is clear that the 44-54 ages group by far had the highest percentage of cinema attendances. Additionally, all the figures in the line graph witnessed increases during the research period.
In 1990, the rate of attendees between tha ages of 44 and 54 was highest, at around 37%, while the figure for 34-to 44-year-olds was slightly lower, at 36%. Meanwhile, the proportion of England people aged 14 to 24 attended the cinema was significantly lower, at only 15%, compared to 23% of cinema attendances from 24-34 age group.
In 2010, the percentage of people aged 44 to 45 in the UK went to the movie theater increased dramatically to over 50%, whereas the rate for individuals between 34 and 44 years old reached 43%. In addition, around 32% of England people from 24 to 34 years old visited the cinema, in comparison with 20% of the youngest age group.
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education 88
- The chart below give information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 38
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 69
- In many countries people now wear Western clothes suits jeans rather than the traditional clothing Why Is this a positive or negative development 87
- The bar chart below shows the reasons for internet usage among British adults(2001) 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7485380117 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71804662134 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8477506197 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998756913385 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545105631139 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254147862231 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069652831978 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119928365561 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.