The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
The bar chart illustrated the information about how many electricities produced and consumpted in ten countries in 2014. (Units are measured by billion kWh) As can be seen, China, the US, and Russia were ranked top three, on the contrary, the Republic of Korea was the lowest.
Looking at the detail, China had made and used a far more high number of power which was 5398 and 5322 billion kWh. Furthermore, the US had manufactured 4099 billion kWh and spent 3866 billion kWh which was lower than China's nearly 1500 billion kWh. In third place, Russia's electricity manufacturing was 1057 and expenditure was 1038, however, it is almost three to four-fold smaller than the US.
Furthermore, in Japan, India, and Canada's electricity producing and spending were between 500-1000 billion kWh. While, power manufacturing and usage were both around 500 kWh in France, Brazil, and Germany. Finally, the Republic of Korea was bottom of the rank, which made 485,1 billion electricity and used 449,5 billion kWh.
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 78
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 61
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., the Republic of Korea was the lowest. Looking at the detail, China had made an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, look, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07272727273 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67832163775 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.538591839 43.030603864 241% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.4 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2 5.23603664747 252% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108597249388 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101111834466 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145870794837 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108021607516 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114657716843 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.