The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in Australia, divided into three categories, from 2001- 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart provides a comparison of the total amount of minutes measured in billions of three different types of telephone calls in Australia over an 8-year-period.
From an overall perspective, it is conspicuous that the volume of users in national, international, and mobile phone calls shows an upward trend, whereas the reversed pattern should be observed for the local category over the years shown. However, the local call reach the highest rank in 2005.
According to the statistic, the minutes of local telephone calls was roughly higher than the others, with the total accounted for 72 billion minutes per year. This number was more than 2 times or even 35 times when compared with the 2 remaining types. Following that the local telephone calls reached a peak in 2005 while these numbers in national, international and mobile types were merely 50 and 12 billion minutes respectively. Nevertheless, at the end of the period, the disparity among the three types was slight as at the beginning.
Following that, only the number of users in local telephone calls witnessed a downward trend over a period. In spite of the fact that the minutes in using local phone calls hosted the highest rank in 2005, it stayed in a similar pattern after at 8 years. Subsequently, there is a dramatic upsurge in the number of users in the two remaining types. The amount of national and international phone calls increased by 23 billion minutes over years shown. Finally, the number of people using mobile phone calls was up to 20 times this number in 2001.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93560606061 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68963667278 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8031049786 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.583333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226782994362 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886444399709 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662580527023 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159748568397 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694041374846 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.