Bar Chart : The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The figure elucidates the rate of individuals who ate five portions of healthy foods per day in the UK between 2001 and 2008. At first glance, it is evident that females has the highest percentage of consuming healthy food in comparing to other aspects.
To begin with, there was a dramatic upsurge in the number of females who ate vegetables and fruits in which it, initially, stood at well beneath 1 in 4 and peaked approximately at a third in 2006. However, it plummeted considerably, plunging to three-tenths by the end of period shown.
In contrast, the percentage of males consumption remained stable for the first three years. Afterwards, it uplifted tremendously from 2003, which made up at just above 15%, through to 2006, which constituted roughly at a fourth, nevertheless, over the following 2 years, it plummeted moderately to just below the previous time. Following the same pattern as males, 2001 to 2008 witnessed a fluctuation of juveniles consumption of healthy foods in which it upright positioned at well under two-tenths in 2001 and terminated to 1 in 4 in 2008.
- Line graph Consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers 95
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the tourist information office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015. 84
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
- some people think newspaper is the most effective way to obtain the latest information because it has more influence than other forms of media. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, third, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97802197802 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02321652943 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620879120879 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6772770857 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.428571429 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201424535179 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895866760288 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103087862169 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137398569893 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715609049067 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.