The bar chart compares the rates of students in different nations in terms of learning a foreign language in year 2000.
The bar chart compares the rates of students in different nations in terms of learning a foreign language in year 2000.
It is clear that Indian students were most proficient in a second language. Additionally, apart from Thailand, female students were better at learning a foreign language than males in all other countries.
For females, the percentage of students in India mastering a foreign language was highest, nearly 70%. The figure for Romania was slightly lower, just over 60%. At the same time, 56% and 42% were the proportions of learners being proficient in a second language in Vietnam and Russia. Meanwhile, Chinese students who were good at an international language made up 28% compared to 26% that of Thailand.
In terms of male, Indian learners were better at studying a second language than students in the remaining countries, which was at 56%. The percentage of students in Romania was significantly lower at 42%. At the same time, the figure for Vietnamese who mastered an international language made up 40%, compared to 35% and approximately 33% those of Russia and Thailand. By contrast, China witnessed the lowest proportion of learners studying a foreign language, at roughly 17%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-28 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one's own family. Why might people want to do this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- Oil Production Capacity 67
- The maps show the changes of Shalton village from 1910 and 2010. 84
- Oil Production Capacity 73
- The bar chart compares the rates of students in different nations in terms of learning a foreign language in year 2000. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15228426396 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89366816827 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527918781726 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8674758844 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2727272727 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339552567026 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160698948835 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.269233417587 0.0843802449381 319% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352134527102 0.15604864568 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.374211966803 0.0819641961636 457% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.