The bar chart compares the rates of students in different nations in terms of learning a foreign language in year 2000.
The bar chart compares the rates of students in different nations in terms of learning a foreign language in year 2000.
It is clear that Indian students were most proficient in a second language. Additionally, apart from Thailand, female students were better at learning a foreign language than males in all other countries.
For females, the percentage of students in India mastering a foreign language was highest, nearly 70%. The figure for Romania was slightly lower, just over 60%. At the same time, 56% and 42% were the proportions of learners being proficient in a second language in Vietnam and Russia. Meanwhile, Chinese students who were good at an international language made up 28% compared to 26% that of Thailand.
In terms of male, Indian learners were better at studying a second language than students in the remaining countries, which was at 56%. The percentage of students in Romania was significantly lower at 42%. At the same time, the figure for Vietnamese who mastered an international language made up 40%, compared to 35% and approximately 33% those of Russia and Thailand. By contrast, China witnessed the lowest proportion of learners studying a foreign language, at roughly 17%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-28 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
- The bar chart compares the figures for 5 different phone brands in terms of sales around the world during a period 4 years. 73
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment We should discourage non essential flight rather than limit the use of cars To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Cinema attendance by age group in Great Britain. 78
- Some people believe the government should spend money building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others however think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinio 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15228426396 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89366816827 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527918781726 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8674758844 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2727272727 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339552567026 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160698948835 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.269233417587 0.0843802449381 319% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352134527102 0.15604864568 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.374211966803 0.0819641961636 457% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.