It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Unable to aid all worldwide people is believed by many; therefore, the concentration of governments on their citizens is necessary. While the possibility of supporting people from other countries could be implemented in several ways, I argue that the government should focus on their own residents more.
To begin with, there are two main reasons why the government should help all people in the world. Firstly, this leads to the promotion of its national image. To be specific, the free provisions of food and medicines of the USA for nations experiencing natural disasters such as a tsunami, earthquakes are appreciated from global community. Hence, America often gains the high respect from others. Moreover, the relationship between nations is heightened when the government of a country support other nations’ citizens, making chances to develop the economy. For example, the supports in funding and machines for farmers in developing countries allow the investors of developed nations to be provided with the reduction of taxes and special treatments to the expansion of their market.
However, I believe that citizens of a nation should be supported more from their government. Obviously, as residents already pay money for national tax system, the government needs to be in charge of the care of them. In fact, in Canada, nearly a half of people’s income is allocated to taxes, and responsibly the government will cover the costs of healthcare services and educational launches for its residents. In addition, the development of a nation often requires a plenty of budgets for many various fields, thus struggling the government in providing an aid for different nations’ people. Southeast Asia, for example, frequently face to the paucity of money for the development of infrastructure and education system. Therefore, the aim to help others in the world is unfeasible.
In conclusion, although it is possible to support citizens in distinct nations I am in opinion that there should be more concentration of the government on their own residents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | IVANTRUONG | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-27 | quynhdieu | 78 | view |
| 2017-08-07 | Nguyen Duc Duy | 61 | view |
- Energy produced from 4 countries 73
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days. 78
- The bar chart compares the figures for 5 different phone brands in terms of sales around the world during a period 4 years. 73
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp others in the world is unfeasible. In conclusion, although it is possible t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39143730887 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08790070885 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550458715596 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.947101484 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.533333333 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185706215593 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768763779859 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086147919866 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146875445709 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727217829565 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.