The bar chart describes the sales of different goods in pounds ( £) in the UK over four seasons in 2015.
The given bar chart covers data on the percentage of people using mobile phones in different places across four age groups in 2015.
Firstly, as can be seen from the chat, while traveling by public transportation, people aged 18 to 29 used their phones much more than others, at 90%. The second and third positions went to 30 - 49 and 50 - 64 aged group. The lowest figure of those who used cell phones in this situation went to people who were 65+ years old.
Secondly, mobile phones were mostly used on street and in restaurants by people in the middle age group, who were 30-49 years old, at 85% and 79%, respectively. These data witnessed 18-29-year-old people holding the second-ranking, at 80% and 73%. The least common group texting and phoning on street or at restaurants in 2015 were the older who was 50 years old and above.
A more detailed look at the bar chart reveals that the young generation, ranging from 18 to 29 years old, used phones in family dinner more frequently than others at 12%. Three other groups saw this figure at no more than 10% in 2015.
In conclusion, the most popular situation in which the majority of people using their cell phones was public transportation why the least one went to family dinner in the reported chart.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-20 | immtee | 67 | view |
2021-09-06 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | view | |
2021-09-06 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 23 | view |
2021-08-02 | ryannguyen0303 | 67 | view |
2021-05-17 | bhoang | 87 | view |
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 61
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, third, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69058295964 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53411294047 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556053811659 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5715417503 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0734692515257 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385641760471 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624758682284 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656736571504 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777674418578 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.