The bar chart describes the sales of different goods in pounds ( £) in the UK over four seasons in 2015
The bar graph compares the turnover (in pounds) for five different items in the UK over four seasons in 2015.
Overall, it can be observed that sales for all categories experienced significant variations according to season. In addition, clothing had by far the highest figure for turnover throughout this period.
Clothing, electrical equipment both had significant fluctuations in sales, which followed a U-shaped pattern, increasing from £100000 and £60000 in spring to £110000 and £80000 in the winter respectively. Similarly, their income had slight drops in summer and autumn before increasing later in winter.
At the other end of the scale, children’s toy were the least popular over the period, except for the final season where the figure grew to £60000 in sales, exceeding the revenues of garden items, which had the lowest data with under £20000. Finally, although household sales figures were popular in the first three seasons, with sales of around £80000 in Spring, at the end of 2015, its revenues ended up to have the second lowest place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-20 | immtee | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | view | |
| 2021-09-06 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 23 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | ryannguyen0303 | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | bhoang | 87 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 56
- Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sports people are too high while others argue that sports salaries are fair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph shows the percentage of people who use mobile phones in four situations grouped by four age groups 80
- The bar chart describes the sales of different goods in pounds in the UK over four seasons in 2015 87
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, similarly, so, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28070175439 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64380525652 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66081871345 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0226521718 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196971979325 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973160694351 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148760147418 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15081317005 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176028953356 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.