The bar chart illustrates the interest of different age group people in the UK in 2016 and the pie chart depicts data about women and men interests.
The bar chart illustrates the interest of different age group people in the UK in 2016 and the pie chart depicts data about women and men interests.
Overall, travelling is preferred by most age group below 75 years, while gardening interests’ people over 75. Gardening is preferred most by both men and women.
In 2016, travelling is considered by most people under '50s with just above 70%, while education takes up nearly a tenth and studying makes up nearly a fifth. People aged between 50 and 75 travel exactly a half and then studying and gardening constitute approximately 50% combined. People over 75 years are more interested in gardening which takes up nearly three quarters and only least people studied with nearly 3%.
It is interesting to note that studying was preferred equally by both men and women. While women were interested in gardening with just below 40%, men like to travel most that makeup nearly 32%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-24 | SaranyaJeevesh | 56 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of seats an airline was able to fill at three time points Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The line graph depicts the amount of spreads namely Margarine, low fat & reduced spreads, and butter consumed between 1981 and 2007. 78
- the changes made in a university office in 2005 and the current year. 67
- Although riding bicycle brings enormous health and environment benefits, the time taken to travel is more compared to other forms of transports 61
- People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests, but based on the kinds of jobs they can get.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9872611465 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63096648871 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7223165439 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377426352708 0.215688989381 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203189829454 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.3023326599 0.0843802449381 358% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342072027064 0.15604864568 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.380528413774 0.0819641961636 464% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.