The presented bar chart elucidates how many individuals in the United Kingdom consuming over 5 portions of vegetables and fish per day from 2011 to 2017.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that women were digested most vegetables and fish between 2011 and 2017. It is also noticeable that children had the least percentage of eating vegetables and fish during the same period.
At the start, women took first place in terms of vegetables and fish consumption when it contributed to 20%. The proportion of people who are female eating vegetables and fish remained unchanged from 2011 to 2013, then the percentage peaked at over 35% during 2016. By contrast, the proportion of teenagers digesting vegetables and fish was the lowest at 10% in 2011. The figure for juveniles consuming fish and vegetables was fluctuated at first then reached 15% in 2015 which was the same proportion during 2017. Meanwhile, the percentage of females eating fish and vegetables was declined gradually to 30%.
Men took the second position on the chart during 7 years period from 2011 to 2017. The proportion began with 17% in 2011 then touched at over 25% during 2017. The percentage of males consuming fish and vegetables in 2012, 2013, 2015, 2016 were 18%, 19%, 23%, 24%, and 23,5% respectively.
- The table gives information about departments and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The map shows changes between 1960 and now in Station Street 73
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05529953917 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67948475584 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52534562212 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7439651028 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159645406 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745247102495 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497487463943 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117487987153 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541230724949 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.