Currently, on account of the growth of electronic devices (mobile phones, computers) usage, people who write letters seem to have a downward trend. Even though many individuals argue that the conventional technique of writing letters will have vanished in the future, I strongly disagree with this opinion for the following reasons.
It is undeniable that a huge number of citizens in recent days are lean towards using smartphones or computers owing to the convenience of mobile devices. When residents require to transmit somebody crucial information, digital appliances will be a great option to choose because it not only comfortable but also save a large amount of time for the senders when the information is sent through Gmail, Facebook, and other social media platforms. By contrast, writing letters will cost people a lot of time to write and deliver as senders have to give letters to the post office and it takes a long time for recipients to receive messages. Thus, transmitting letters is said to be a waste of time to send especially when people must give necessary details immediately. Hence, many people predict that writing letters will disappear in the foreseeable future.
Despite some negatives impacts, the traditional skills of writing letters still play an indispensable role in people’s lives because of several perks which cannot be completely eradicated. Without a shadow of a doubt, writing letters used in many government offices owing to its safety for both senders and receivers, compared to transmitting through social media platforms which security information might easily be stolen by hackers. For instance, in Vietnam, the electricity department used writing letters to complain, for requesting of electricity meter and so on. Furthermore, delivering letters to friends and family members is a show gesture of love because it is a phenomenal way to demonstrate an emotion from writers to readers and this cannot be replaced by text messages and images. Therefore, writing letters are not vanishing by any circumstances.
To summarize, because of their ease and efficiency, cell phones and computers are expected to remain the primary methods of communication. Nevertheless, I feel that conventional letter-writing abilities are vital since they are superior in some unique cases.
- Some people think that people moving to a new country should accept new culture in the foreign country rather than living as a separate minority group with different lifestyle Do you agree or disagree 78
- Creative artists should be given the freedom to express their ideas through words pictures music or films Some people nevertheless think that the government should restrict artists freedom of expression To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 70
- The maps below show Pancha Village in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'transmitting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: transmitting
... mobile devices. When residents require to transmit somebody crucial information, digital a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sily be stolen by hackers. For instance, in Vietnam, the electricity department u...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40771349862 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99150976526 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586776859504 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8681075085 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.214285714 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374546904178 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13720662871 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797402212352 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21995359995 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456931244328 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.