The bar chart depicts the information about the count of individuals in the UK consuming more than 5 portions of vegetables and fish each day from 2011 to 2017.
After analyzing, it can be seen clearly that in 2011 to 2013 women were eating food identical in given bar chart. While, men were also almost same ate vegetables and fish per day in first 3 years. In 2011, children were portion visible 10 , in next two years portion was under 15 percent.
The chart further collates that in 2014 females consumption was near about 30 percentile and children was near 15 proportion and in last men portion was almost 20 per cent. whilst, in 2015 toddlers were ate vegetables and fish 15 proportion, women were above 30 and men were under 25 percentage.In last second year, Ladies were touched peak level in consumed, children was under 15 and gentleman were again under 25 proportion.In last 2017 boys were consumed near about 25 proportion, women and children on 30% and 15% correspondingly.
As an overall perspective, women were maximum in portion of vegetables and fish per day, however children were least in given vertical bar graph.
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 61
- News plays an important part of most people s lives Why is news so important to people Why is so much news dedicated to bad news Should the news focus on good news instead 61
- Some people think that exercise is key to health while others feel that having balanced diet is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 55
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The charts below show the average number of calories that is amount of energy in food and drink that a person consumes daily in five countries and the percentage of the adult population that was overweight or obese in 2013 in those countries Summarize the 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 2011, children were portion visible 10 , in next two years portion was under 15 ...
^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...two years portion was under 15 percent. The chart further collates that in 2014 ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
...ast men portion was almost 20 per cent. whilst, in 2015 toddlers were ate vegetables a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...ove 30 and men were under 25 percentage.In last second year, Ladies were touched p...
^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gentleman' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'gentlemen'.
Suggestion: gentlemen
... in consumed, children was under 15 and gentleman were again under 25 proportion.In last ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...entleman were again under 25 proportion.In last 2017 boys were consumed near about...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86153846154 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6860585351 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.0125223001 43.030603864 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171550596943 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116051932574 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897885262729 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163371819559 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956422669336 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.