The bar chart present the percentage of changing cars in 2009 in an European country.
The bar charts give information about changing cars of residents from a survey taken place in an European country in 2009.
Overall, the majority of people in this country decided to replace their old cars after 5 years or more and their favorite choice was buying a second-hand one.
In a survey, there was 2% of respondents said they didn't have any cars. Meanwhile, the percentage of participants changing their cars after 5 years or more was highest (52%), followed by the opinion "3-4 years" at the percentage of 37%. Other sectors, "every year", "2 years" and "no change", accounted for a minor proportion with being no more than 5%.
Interestingly, 2% those surveyed mentioned that they had no plans on purchasing a car in the future. Over half of people in this country said that they would buy second-hand cars when they wanted to change their cars, meanwhile, "a new car" was the choice of 23% of those. Only 8% of people asked felt good with both a second-hand car and a new one.
- the graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the uk from 1990 to 2005 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for the development 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
- The responsibility for protecting and reducing global environmental damage lies with politicians as there is very little that the individual can do this Do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... residents from a survey taken place in an European country in 2009. Overall,...
^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
..., there was 2% of respondents said they didnt have any cars. Meanwhile, the percentag...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01714285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85428428428 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622857142857 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0029295802 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19326364381 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978694192732 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118444705053 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150774369831 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140733516297 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.