The bar chart present the percentage of changing cars in 2009 in an European country.
The bar charts give information about changing cars of residents from a survey taken place in an European country in 2009.
Overall, the majority of people in this country decided to replace their old cars after 5 years or more and their favorite choice was buying a second-hand one.
In a survey, there was 2% of respondents said they didn't have any cars. Meanwhile, the percentage of participants changing their cars after 5 years or more was highest (52%), followed by the opinion "3-4 years" at the percentage of 37%. Other sectors, "every year", "2 years" and "no change", accounted for a minor proportion with being no more than 5%.
Interestingly, 2% those surveyed mentioned that they had no plans on purchasing a car in the future. Over half of people in this country said that they would buy second-hand cars when they wanted to change their cars, meanwhile, "a new car" was the choice of 23% of those. Only 8% of people asked felt good with both a second-hand car and a new one.
- In many countries it is becoming more and more common to pay for things using mobile phone mobile phone apps Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 73
- In many countries it is becoming more and more common to pay for things using mobile phone mobile phone apps Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 89
- The bar chart present the percentage of changing cars in 2009 in an European country. 78
- The bar chars show the number of cars per thousand people in 5 different countries in Europe in 2005, 2009 and 2010 in comparison with the average number. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... residents from a survey taken place in an European country in 2009. Overall,...
^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
..., there was 2% of respondents said they didnt have any cars. Meanwhile, the percentag...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01714285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85428428428 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622857142857 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0029295802 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19326364381 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978694192732 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118444705053 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150774369831 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140733516297 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.