The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile (cell phones) in a European country from January to September 2002, measured in euro.
The chart illustrates the costs of four mobile phone contracts (in euros) monthly in a European country during the first three quarters of 2002.
As can be seen, the general trend is of an increase except for Sim TX, with the most remarkable growth being Alpha, which overtook Domo to become the most expensive provider.
In January, Domo had the highest price of €15, followed by Lex and Sin TX, which cost €12 and €9.5 respectively. With just €5 a month, Alpha was the cheapest mobile provider. Eight months later, Domo experienced a remarkable rise despite at different paces, reaching a peak of €25 a month in August before falling slightly to a low of €23 in September. Alpha had an identical pattern but rose more dramatically. Despite a period of stability of around €5 and €6 until June, it witnessed a surge in price and surpassed Domo to become the priciest contract with €25.
After a €2 decrease in February, the price offered by Lex bounced again and climbed gradually to a high of €18, albeit a mild fluctuation during the period. Sim TX, on the other hand, had a reverse trend. After a significant increase of €5 in June, it suddenly declined to return its original price.
- Write about the following topic Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 89
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- People nowadays spend their free time less actively than in the past Do you agree or disagree 86
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram below shows how oil is expected in use of production of perfume 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59409581929 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1311749285 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168404675789 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067288307193 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125710748356 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136106781794 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175170031301 0.0819641961636 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.