The figure above shows data on the percentage of people who consumed fast food with different frequency over three various years in the United States.
Overall, there were significant changes in a number of groups. However, it can be noticed that the main normal distribution had been staying for all the duration.
According to the bar chart, we can see that the proportion of those people who had never tried or had eaten fast food every day stayed the same on the position of under the 5% for whole the period with the minimum fluctuations. In contrast, the percentage of people who enjoyed this type of meal several times a week was maximum in 2006 (20%) and a little bit more than 15% in 2003 and 2013.
Likewise, the amount of humans who ate fast food once a week or once or twice a month was the same in 2003. This picture had changed in both 2006 and 2013 years, where the differences between their values were around 7% and 5% respectively. Also, the proportion of individuals who tried fast food a few times a year increased in 2006 and then was stable.
- The pie charts give information about the world s forest in five different regions 84
- In advertising nowadays businesses usually highlight and emphasise that their products are new in some way Why do businesses practice this Do you think this development is a positive practice or a negative one 61
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...es a week was maximum in 2006 20% and a little bit more than 15% in 2003 and 2013. Li...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59067357513 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43486933673 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60621761658 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.316674913 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17725396377 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692496323851 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505482468359 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966444768634 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060162416227 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.