The bar chart represents water use given in the percentage in a number of different regions in 1995.
The given bar graph depicts the information about the percentage of using water for industry, domestic and agriculture purposes by different five areas.
Taking a general overview, it is apparent that the usage of water for industry purpose was the highest percentage by among countries. While, for domestic reasons, it showed the lowest proportion, which was around 10.
It can be clearly seen that Africa had the maximum percentage of using water for industry purpose, which accounted for approximately 85% followed by Asia and Latin America (80% and 70% respectively). Whilst, the proposition of utilizing water for industry by European was minimum, which constituted only 35%.
Turning to the next information, as compared to the North America, 5% more water was used for agriculture reasons in Europe. However, in Africa, Latin America and Asia, Showed a marginal difference of using water. Although, as regards domestic reasons, the percentage of consuming water in the given all countries was less than 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Guri473812 | 90 | view |
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success Others argue that happiness depends on different factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons and how can people research this 73
- The chart below shows the proportion of people who ate at least five portions of Fruit and Vegetables per day in Canada from 2001 to 2010 84
- The bar chart represents water use given in the percentage in a number of different regions in 1995 90
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3875 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82663116625 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5208270469 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228836668103 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114095166934 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810989248405 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163954157945 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904583566122 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.