The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.
A glimpse at the graph provided reveals the utilization of various measures on disposing wastes in four cities, namely Toronto, Madrid , Kuala Lumpur and Amman. All in all, handling by compositing is the least prevalent method among these region.
Among the areas given, Toronto witnessed the most enormous gap on comparing landfill to other ways. Over 70% of wastes are delivered to their landfills while each of the remaining ways picks up less than 10%. Likewise, second in terms of utilization of landfill is Amman, with less than 50% of their rubbishes consumed by this method, compared with less than 40% incinerated.
By contrast, the pivotal way Madrid and Kuala Lumpur use is the incineration, with 40% and more than 50% of their garbages are burnt. Recycling get rid of approximately one-fifth of wastes in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, in comparison to far less utilization of compositing, in which less than 10% wastes are handled in this way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-22 | Hira Shaheen | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Hira Shaheen | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 73
- Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- Cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and less people use cash. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 77
- Nowadays it is more difficult for children to concentrate to pay attention in school.Discuss the causes and propose some solutions. 56
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s in four cities, namely Toronto, Madrid , Kuala Lumpur and Amman. All in all, han...
^^
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this region' or 'these regions'?
Suggestion: this region; these regions
...ing is the least prevalent method among these region. Among the areas given, Toronto wit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
...ethod among these region. Among the areas given, Toronto witnessed the most enorm...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05063291139 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7136305919 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3508975832 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256301155341 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119401448126 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121539614883 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193201165038 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109499779867 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.