The bar chart illustrates Finland and Sweden's percentages of divorce between 2011 and 2015.
In the first glance, it was noticeable that Sweden's divorce rates were higher than Finland's, which were all above 40% except the year of 2015. In 2012, Sweden's percentages of divorce had reached a peak, which was around 50%, while Finland had the least rates, which was only 32%. Furthermore, the percentages of divorcement had gently dipped year by year, which was only left 48% in 2015.
As the chart demonstrates, Finland's divorce rates, on the other hand, had an approximate decrease of 5%. In addition, it had dramatically increased from 32% in 2012 to 39% in 2013, it was the hugest change that with a 7% difference. Not to mention, it had slightly risen in the last two-year period, which was 41% and 42% respectively.
To sum up, it was evident that Sweden had the highest divorce rates since 2011, however, it had lesser than Finland in 2015.
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 71
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 78
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people think that men and women have different qualities. Therefore, somecertain jobs are suitable for men and some jobs are suitable for women. To what extentdo you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, while, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86503067485 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63302420046 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.9022927439 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.125 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133401314595 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773367946185 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588614133041 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116541638518 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05906561854 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.