The bar chart illustrates the percentage of people in France using different kinds of transportation between 1990 and 2010.
From the chart, it was noticeable that over the 30-year period, people had started to drive by their own. The percentage of driving had increased dramatically and reached a peak, which was from 51 percent in 1990 to 92 percent in 2010. On the other hand, people who had taken bus had decreased sharply to only around 30 percent in 2010. In addition, the transportation of train and bicycle had shown some fluctuation. Throughout the 20 years, there were gradually decreased by seven percent and 15 percent of individuals using train and bicycle. However, the percentage of people who commuted train had become the second highest.
To sum up, it was clear that citizens in France had started to drive around by their own vehicles and less of them were taking the public bus.
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 56
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sector's contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91503267974 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68391194232 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562091503268 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1744982231 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197812880559 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102709869321 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121590172858 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189424898496 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164488905565 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.