The bar chart demonstrates the expectation to change of European young people in the 20 following years in 5 different categories.
Overall, Ofthere was an upward trend of people communication will improve while the downward trend of air quality.
Look at the details, from three highest expectation namely people accommodation, food quality and water quality, the percentage of people who will improve people accommodation is highest with approximately 62% while the figures of water quality is lowest with nearly 22%. Its seem to be that the citizens in Europe concerning more about accommodation in the future. Moreover the proportion of citizens will improve water quality was 40% but the figure of people get worse was higher than people get improve.
Futhermore, from two lowest expectation namely health and air quality, its crystal seen that the number of people who improve health was higher than the figure of air quality with 41% and 22% respectively. We can expect that European
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 73
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below Write at least 150 words 67
- The line graph below shows the average monthly temperatures in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart demonstrates the expectati...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owing years in 5 different categories. Overall, Ofthere was an upward trend of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile the downward trend of air quality. Look at the details, from three highest ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...more about accommodation in the future. Moreover the proportion of citizens will improve...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se was higher than people get improve. Futhermore, from two lowest expectation ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...espectively. We can expect that European
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2641509434 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85799062956 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8411747207 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237717070426 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147789292053 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.201940841809 0.0843802449381 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213353662513 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.240639828489 0.0819641961636 294% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.