The bar chart illustrates the frequency of eating at fast food restaurants in the US in three years 2003, 2006 and 2013.
It can be seen the percentage of people who ate once a week and those who ate once or twice a month had the highest value in all three years. People who claimed they ate once a week increased (2 to 3%) in 2006 in comparison to 2003, however, this number decreased to almost 27% later in 2013. The number of people who claimed they ate once or twice a month dropped to 25% in 2006, however, it went up again in 2013 and reached to almost 33%.
It seems the number of people who ate every day and those who never ate at a fast food restaurant showed a small change and fluctuated between 4 to 5 percent. However, the numbers in both groups declined between the years 2003 and 2006 and then it remained steady.
The number of people who ate several times a week has been ranked in the third place in all three years. It can be seen this number reached a peak in 2006 with 20% and again fell down to almost 16% as it was in 2003.
And last but not least, the number of people who ate at fast food restaurants a few times a year has been placed it the fourth place in all three years and fluctuated between 13 and 15 percent, however, it does not show so much changes between the year 2006 and 2013.
- Tourism today creates a variety of problems such as pollution due to flights transport and dirty water Do you think that governments should impose extra taxes on flights or accommodation to restrict today s tourism industry Give reasons for your answer an 73
- the diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Your internet connection has been slow and intermittent Write a letter to your internet service provider to complain In the letter Describe the problem and why you are unhappy Arrange for an engineer to visit your home Request a reduction in your bill 73
- You recently broke your leg and your colleagues from work sent you get well cards and presents Write a letter to them and say Thank them for supporting you Describe how you spend your time Explain about your recovery process 73
- In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing Why is this happening What will be the effects of it on the family and society 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...5 percent, however, it does not show so much changes between the year 2006 and 2013....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, third, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.12451361868 4.92477711251 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09140982695 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455252918288 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6804212534 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.777777778 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287170297107 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139176756956 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855528806809 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190166577385 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838348663107 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.91 11.4140731707 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.