Nowadays many traditions are going to be disappeared. One of the traditions that are vanishing throughout the world is having meals will all family members. In this essay, we examine the reasons for this fact, and we discuss the effect of this phenomenon on families and societies.
The industrial revolution changed the way of life in almost all parts of the world. It generated new facilities that made our life easier. However, each advantage may bring some disadvantages as well. One of the consequences of changes that have been made in human life by the development of technologies is the changes that have been happening in our traditions.
Let us give an example. When the bicycle was invented, many people could not use it due to their costumes. Therefore, some tendencies appeared that changed the way that people wore daily clothes.
In the same way, due to the hours people have to spend outside of their homes for work or education, they have less time to spend with their family members. Therefore, one of the first things that suffered from this new situation was the number of meals we could have with our immediate family. In the beginning, it was only lunch meal which has been eliminated from our family gathering schedules, because most of the time people has to stay outside during the day time. However, gradually people who spent more and more time in traffic jams tried to eat their breakfast on the way or even at the workplace.
In other words, it is almost the dinner meal that most of the families still have together.
Although our family connections diluted according to this change, however, our relationships in societies also changed. We are more depend on our friends and colleagues because we spend more time with them in comparison to our families.
In conclusion, changing in our traditions is entirely unavoidable because we are living in societies which are changing rapidly as a matter of development of technologies.
- You recently broke your leg and your colleagues from work sent you get well cards and presents Write a letter to them and say Thank them for supporting you Describe how you spend your time Explain about your recovery process 73
- the diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Would the drawbacks of such a requirement be greater than the benefits to the community and the individual young adults 67
- The more a product is advertised the more people want to buy it To what extent do you agree or disagree 54
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9335347432 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7175759774 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513595166163 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9951188731 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7222222222 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239032728069 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757726269761 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790682318983 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122892683799 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110012407137 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, in other words, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9335347432 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7175759774 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513595166163 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9951188731 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7222222222 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3888888889 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239032728069 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757726269761 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790682318983 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122892683799 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110012407137 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.