The bar chart shows the literacy rate (% of people who can read and write) by region and gender in 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart describes the percentage of people who can read and write by seven regions and two genders in 2011.
Overall, all the people in Central Asia and Europe can both write and read, while the literacy rate in Sub-Saharan Africa accounted for the lowest rate among the seven countries.
According to the bar charts, only two countries have the same literacy rates with both men and women being at around 100%. In East Asia and Latin America, the percentage of literate males was higher than females. Also, the number of males in the two countries was similar. The percentage of females in East Asia is almost 87% and more than 3% in Latin America. The difference between men and women rates was maximum by 20% in South and West Asia.
We can see that the lowest literacy rates were recorded in the Arab States, South-West Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa with rates of 75%, 65% and 60% respectively. The rating of people who can read and write from Sub-Saharan Africa is the least valued with rates less than 80%. The difference in literacy rate for males reached around 30% when comparing Central Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. This value was more for females close to 40%.
- The bar chart shows the literacy rate of people who can read and write by region and gender in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77073170732 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3299207361 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507317073171 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3657376096 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9090909091 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217527475623 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918177376406 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109340982762 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184122156382 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113402445597 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.