The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps show changes to the Colwick Arts Centre between 2005 and today.
We can see that the Colwick Arts Centre made many changes during this period, including new buildings and recreation facilities.
In the past, the concert hall and cinema were fronts of the Information desk. But now, it is turned into two different halls and relocated to the top right-hand corner of the park, in addition, it is turned into two different rooms. In 2005, there were two galleries on the right, whereas now the concert hall and toilet are there. And two galleries became into one big hall, removed to the left.
The snack bar was demolished: however, in their park created a new studio drama and the meeting room is also developed into two smaller rooms next to the cinema hall. The Colwick Arts Centre is also built a new central exhibition area. What is more, on the wasteland, trees are planted around the stage and constructed outdoor exhibition and performance areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | maidiem.1508 | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-27 | taoxanh99 | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the literacy rate of people who can read and write by region and gender in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
- The maps below show Colwick Arts Centre in 2005 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...into one big hall, removed to the left. The snack bar was demolished: however, i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, in addition, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82035928144 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39429623305 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0938420246 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138902811126 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750972639062 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111608675291 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134307079463 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134436853489 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...into one big hall, removed to the left. The snack bar was demolished: however, i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, in addition, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82035928144 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39429623305 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0938420246 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4444444444 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138902811126 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750972639062 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111608675291 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134307079463 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134436853489 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.