The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 countries in Europe over the 3 years 2005, 2009, 2015, compared with the European average.
The bar char illustrates how cars were used by European people, one in a thousand, in five different countries over the three periods 2005, 2009 and 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that Germany accounted for the highest number of cars use. Over the years, the used of cars became more popular for people in Europe.
In 2005, the use of cars was the most popular in Germany and in contrast, this trend was converted in the figure for Greece. There was a similar number in car used in France and UK, which was just under 700 people in every 1000. The next country was Italy in terms of popularity, at 500 people. About 700 people was the number of cars used in 2005 and 2009 in terms of European average, this figure went up to nearly 800 people in the end of the period.
In comparison, there was a dramatic increase in the number of cars use in Greece in the next four years, which was at 400 people. In contrast, UK and Germany witnessed a drop in the cars use to only 600 and around 850 people respectively. In Italy, after having risen approximately to 580 people in 2009, the number of cars used was fell to just above 500 people. France was the only country that remain unchanged in 10 years period, at 700 people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Thu Mo | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Diem Hang 1612 | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about trends in Internet use by females in the USA in two years 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 78
- A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 81
- The table below shows the results of a 25 year study on the use of bicycles in Britain by age and gender 68
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he three periods 2005, 2009 and 2015. Overall, it can be seen that Germany acc...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the highest number of cars use. Over the years, the used of cars became more popu...
^^
Line 13, column 240, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...600 and around 850 people respectively. In Italy, after having risen approximately...
^^
Line 13, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he only country that remain unchanged in 10 years period, at 700 people.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41228070175 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26012989328 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482456140351 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7018239694 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4545454545 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255345953985 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11397696518 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707489026622 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179437378409 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535956718897 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.