The bar chart shows the number of girls per 100 boys enrolled in different levels of school education.
The bar graph depicts information about the primary, secondary and territory education level of girls relation to boys in developed and developing countries in 1990 and 1998.
Overall, the emerging fact from the graph is that boys who enrolled in school were more than girls both in 1990 and 1998 in all nations, except territory education in developed nations, although the figures were lower in developing nations.
Turning to the detail, there was more number of boys than girls in primary and secondary education. Even though the proportion of female signup rose, there were still 90 women for every 100 men, in poorer regions, while in richer regions there was little difference in genders. Similarly, in high school, the ratio of feminine to men registered was almost 100:100 in both years and developing countries, it increased from about 70:100 to over 80:100.
Marching forward, territory education, the biggest discrepancy can be seen. While in developed nations more females than males were registered, in developing regions under 80 girls for every 100 boys in 1998, despite an increase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | Lamdao1506 | view | |
| 2023-02-22 | Mabel Nguyenn | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | bapcai | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- The first graph shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by the farm each month in 2013 and also almost in tonnes of fertilizer used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month 84
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the household spending pattern in two countries between 1980 and 2008 73
- The line graph show internet users as percentage of population 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, similarly, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26553672316 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58426255864 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598870056497 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5617424138 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.142857143 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24909510746 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108361186529 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573394862709 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146443591535 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455663956702 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.