Nowadays, the media is paying a lot of attention to the life stories of famous people in fields such as cinema, sports, and modeling. What are the reasons for this? Do u think it is a positive or negative trend...
There is no denying the fact that the media play a key role in attracting people from the life stories of well-known personalities, such as actors, cricketers, and models. There are several contributing reasons behind this trend. In my opinion, this trend has both positive and negative impacts on people.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons why the media pays more attention to the life stories of prevalent people for attracting people's eyeballs. One of the predominant reasons is making a decent profit and being popular among the viewers. Broadcasting the life journey of a famous person is a great way to attract more viewers and this thing further lead to a good amount of earnings. In india, take as an example, social networking channels like AAJ TAK- a quite popular news channel, gains its popularity by showcasing the current events of cricketers and actors and makes a great profit from them. Another point is that making a better relationship with famous people so that in the future, they conduct their first interview with them. For instance, Rohit Sharma- a profound cricketer, has good bonding with many social networking services. After making two and half-centuries in a cricket match against Sri Lanka, he provided his first interview to the media which support him more.
On the other hand, there are both positive and negative developments of this trend. On the positive side, it motivates people. A fan of a cricketer gets motivated by watching the short biopic of that cricketer. This thing no doubt helps people accomplish their goals. On the negative side, this trend plays a crucial role in destroying the life of the big fans. People who always watch their favorite actress present affairs on social media are not able to focus more on their career paths. This can be led to an unsuccessful life for the biggest fans of cricketers or actors.
To sum up, broadcasting the lifetime events of prevalent personalities indeed is the best way to make more profits and viewers for media. However, I believe that even though, it is a positive trend, the negative impacts of it should not be neglected(overlooked).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-03 | Manvir singh | 73 | view |
- In the future no body will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything online without paying To what extend do you agree or disagree to this opinion 78
- The table below gives information about the average annual spending of University students in three countries 78
- The table shows data about the underground railway system in six major cities with date opened kilometer or route and passenger numbers per year in millions 78
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Many people believe that education and high qualification will bring success Others think that it is not required to achieve success in life Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, well, for instance, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97222222222 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76619250734 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7986330587 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2105263158 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289127953685 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914779012707 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703521292406 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181022977884 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054831871874 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.