The bar chart shows the number of international passengers by different regions between 2019 and 2020 and the pie chart gives information about the shares in 2020

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the number of international passengers by different regions between 2019 and 2020 and the pie chart gives information about the shares in 2020

The given bar chart illustrates the quantity of the passengers who from around the world by different nations in 2020 and 2019, measured in million, while the pie chart demonstrates the proportion of share in the year 2020, measured in percentage.

Overall, it is clear from the charts that Europe showed a significant amount in international passengers as well as the percentages of shares, while Africa represented the smallest figure in both charts.

To commence with, the number of international passengers in Europe and Asia/Pacific were up to 856 million passengers and 496 million passengers in 2019, respectively. However, these data experienced a considerable decrease in the next year, which were 370 million passengers in Europe and 172 million passengers in Asia/Pacific. Similarly, Middles East, North America and Latin America/Caribbean showed the same stereotype. Especially, only 74 million global travelers represented in Africa in 2019 and went down to 39 million in 2020.

In terms of the major amount, Europe accounted for 47% share of total and over two ten of those in Asia/Pacific. The segment of share in Middle East, North America, Latin America/Caribbean and Africa was 31% of total share in 2020.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-14 karenthudoan 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...t nations in 2020 and 2019, measured in million, while the pie chart demonstrates the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erica and Latin America/Caribbean showed the same stereotype. Especially, only 74...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36597938144 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23340535541 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561855670103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5195668398 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.125 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300023639178 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120346494074 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102207777156 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185122370056 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104928464805 0.0819641961636 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.