The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050.

The bar chart compares how many dependents there were in 2000 and will be in 2050 in five various countries around the world. Overall, it is obvious that the average percentage of world independents is predicted to rise to about 42% in 2050 from around 25% in 2000. The data in the five countries can be roughly separated into two groups, one consisting of Indonesia, China, Korea, and Japan, the other comprising India.
As we can see from the first group, there will be an increase in the number of dependents in the four countries from 2000 to 2050. A significant rise can be seen in the percentage of Korean independents, rising from the lowest point (about 20%) in 2000 to 40% in 2050, almost a twofold increase. Also, the proportion of Japanese dependents will have reached the peak at about 50% in 2050, much higher than the world average figure. Although the percentage of dependents in Japan in not only 2000 but also 2050 far exceeded that of dependents in Korea, the latter will reflect a larger growth rate. Meanwhile, the number of dependents in both China and Indonesia will increase by the same percentage (5%), from nearly 30% to approximately 35%. However, in the second group, five decades will witness a modest decrease in the number of Indian dependents, from 35% to 27%.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-27 HARPREET KAUR MAAN 78 view
2019-06-16 EriolYang 78 view
2018-12-30 Frank Chen 84 view
2018-12-30 Frank Chen 84 view
2018-12-30 Frank Chen 84 view
Essays by user Frank Chen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73777777778 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62582050669 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551111111111 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.2204860051 43.030603864 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369704501387 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164656714696 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127946891251 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331851275951 0.15604864568 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984369966762 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.