Essay on the topic of oil usage by four major consumers along with future predictions in a line chart.
The given line chart compares and predicts the data related to oil consumption in four major countries: the US, China, Middle-east, and Western Europe, and Japan starting from 2009 until 2030.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a downward trend from a position of highest stagnancy, the US will lead the chart in the upcoming years followed next by China. However, the Middle-east and western Europe and Japan will be following a reverse trend.
According to the given illustration, starting with the maximum 10 million barrels per day in 2009, the US engulfed the market by leveling off until 2015 before observing a sharp plummet that dragged the demand down by 2 million in 2020. Also, it is expected that the demand will continue to dip prior to reaching 4 million by the end of 2030.
On the contrary, China, who started with the lowest 1.8million barrels, rose dramatically to overtake Europe and Japan in 2020 and will double its demand after a decade. Whilst, Middle-east was lower by half as compared to Western Europe and Japan(4 million barrels), the former is expected to take over the latter by nearly 50% by 2030.
- Essay on the topic of oil usage by four major consumers along with future predictions in a line chart 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 89
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the population figures for different types of turtles in India from 1980 to 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...espite a downward trend from a position of highest stagnancy, the US will lead the chart i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96464646465 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5798788578 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60101010101 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7132383633 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0948882122543 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04247412587 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069365272187 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685534529517 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811041887408 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.