The bar chart shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart illustrates the changes in five servings of healthy foods among men, women and children in the UK over the course of 7 years, from 2001 to 2008.
Overall, the consumption of healthy fruits of men, women and children exhibited an upward trend over the 30-year period. Meanwhile the percentage of women eating five portions of fruits and vegetables was the highest all over the period.
In 2001, approximately 17% of men ate healthily, while around 12% of children had five healthy portions. Following 2 years, men and children maintained a marginal presence in consuming healthy foods. In 2006, the figure for men and children increased significantly to around 27% and 23% respectively. This distribution indicates that people started to care about their health in 2006. In 2008, the proportion of men and children consuming healthy servings mostly remained unchanged compared to the year of 2006.
The women were representatives for having a healthy life, with leading at 21% in 2001. Moreover, the figure for women rose sharply to around 35% in 2006, before witnessing a slight decline, at 30% in 2008.
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 78
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 67
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1998 and in 2008 78
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09239130435 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80754262744 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1056864375 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183014911942 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734556634541 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081074377538 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124240218986 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779011863614 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.