The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Illustrated in the bar chart are figures regarding university participation rates among young people in our countries lettered A, B, C and D in three separate years 2000, 2005 and 2010.
As can be inferred from the chart, the proportions of solo college students in countries A and D reflected an upward progression, whereas a period of stability was presented in those of countries B and C. Another key feature is that country D registered the highest college attendance rate out of the aunties examined.
At the outset of the survey, approximately 38% was the percentage of young undergraduate schoolers in country A, being the lowest compared to the after which this figure rose to around 58% by the end. Similarly, an upward tendency was also seen in the proportion of youngsters attending college in country D, with figures surging by exactly 20% throughout the survey. -
The aforementioned upward pattern was not recorded in the college participation rates in countries B and C; rather, these two countries witnessed a period of stability in their relevant figures. While the former's data stabilized at the neighborhood of 40%, the latter clustered around the vicinity of 50%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- The table and pie chart give information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by exactly 20% throughout the survey. - The aforementioned upward pattern was no...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'formers'' or 'former's'?
Suggestion: formers'; former's
...ty in their relevant figures. While the formers data stabilized at the neighborhood of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15463917526 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06374957735 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634020618557 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8444722731 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.857142857 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12203772306 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599910628111 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107827338752 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096982582381 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128194573656 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by exactly 20% throughout the survey. - The aforementioned upward pattern was no...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'formers'' or 'former's'?
Suggestion: formers'; former's
...ty in their relevant figures. While the formers data stabilized at the neighborhood of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15463917526 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06374957735 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634020618557 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.8444722731 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.857142857 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12203772306 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599910628111 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107827338752 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096982582381 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128194573656 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.