The table and pie chart give information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The pie chart and the table given illustrate the figures relating to the citizens/ inhabitants in Australia based on various nationalities and regions.
Looking at the charts, it is immediately clear that while the majority of Australian citizens were native/ indigenous, the least population in the country was recorded for those being Dutch. Another key feature is that most people in Australia were city-dwellers.
In terms of the pie chart, the percentage of people hailing from Australia accounted for 73%. Meanwhile, the proportion of those with other nationalities doubled the rate of those who were British, which was 14% to 7%. Minorities were seen in the proportion of Dutch and Chinese people, as well as New Zealanders. To be specific, these figures were 1%, 2% and 3%, respectively.
Regarding the table, 89% was the percentage of Australian citizens hailing from Britain resided in the city, whereas 11% was the figure for those living in the countryside. A somewhat uniform ratio was seen in New Zealanders being resident in urban and rural areas, which was 90% to 10%. The percentage of authentic Australian city-dwellers and rural residents accounted for 80% and 20%, respectively. Meanwhile, 83% and 17% were the respective figures for Dutch nationals living in Australian urban and rural regions. Almost all chinese people based in Australia resided in cities, with only 1% among them living in the countryside
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-29 | phoebeluu48 | 66 | view |
- The table and pie chart give information about the population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st people in Australia were citydwellers In terms of the pie chart the percentage...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, so, then, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08733624454 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90438647628 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497816593886 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 229.0 22.4926829268 1018% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1165.0 112.824112599 1033% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 229.0 22.9334400587 999% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 63.0 5.23603664747 1203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0983659918068 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983659918068 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844907999593 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464850228599 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 117.0 13.2329268293 884% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -160.96 61.2550243902 -263% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 92.6 10.3012195122 899% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.72 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.51 8.06136585366 230% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 11.4329268293 525% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 93.6 10.9970731707 851% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 94.0 11.0658536585 849% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.