The chart compares the proportion of young people in higher education in 4 nations from 2000 to 2010.
It can be seen that for all figures the overall trend was upward, except for country B. In addition, country D had the highest percentage of young people in higher education.
Turning to the chart for more details, in 2000, university attendees in country B accounted for 40% of its population, compared to about 45% that in country D. Over the next 10 years, the proportion of young people in university in country D peaked at about 60%, while that in country B remained unchanged and finished at 40% despite a small dip in 2005.
Regarding the other remaining, in 2000, there was 35% of young people attending University in country A, which was significantly lower than in country C(42%). During the followinh ten years, that in country C climbed to finish at 48 % before remained stable in 2005 , while those in country A recorded an enormous growth to 58% in the final year.
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 78
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 67
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...h at 48 % before remained stable in 2005 , while those in country A recorded an e...
^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2005 , while those in country A recorded an enormous growth to 58% in the final y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71511627907 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62744265052 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2128098922 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245067315958 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147098472749 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151515026672 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202580469387 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155082103653 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.