The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
The bar chart gives information about the proportions of young people who attended higher education in four different countries during the period from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the rates of students in Country A, C and D while the figure for Country B was unchanged. It is also clear that both Country A and D experienced a dramatic change over the given period.
Starting at 40%, the percentage of those in higher education in Country B remained almost the same, except for a slight decrease of just 1% in 2005. At the same time, the figure for Country C increased noticeably from around 41% in 2000 to over 45% in 2005 and then remained until the following five years.
In comparison, those who studied higher in Country A accounted for roughly 35% in the first period, which was lower than that of Country D, at about 45%. Afterwards, the percentages of these two countries saw a continual rise to approximately 56% for the former and 60% for the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- More and more people are opting for ready made food instead of home made food Do you think this option has MORE advantages or disadvantages 78
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
- The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 73
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...emained until the following five years. In comparison, those who studied higher ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69714285714 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63572938439 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611428571429 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.5122176961 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207980914399 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997537775868 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127205970164 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145287686766 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146827159559 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.